On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > > > you're using this in. > > > > > > Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you > > > confirm? > > > > Confirmed; requirements to notify the author are non-free. > Bullshit. There's no requirement whatsoever that a source file may be > used at all "commercially", assuming the common definition of > "commercial" == "closed source". Such a definition is wrong, and will not appear in any dictionary entry for that word. This license is clearly non-free in the absence of clarification from the author, as it fails DFSG #6. Please base your arguments in favor of the freeness of a given license on something more substantial than Shit You Made Up. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature