Re: [xdebug-general] Re: Is the xdebug's non-free license necessary?
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Derick Rethans <email@example.com>
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Debian packages frequently contain changes from the upstream
> >> versions. (These patches are generally sent upstream, but the
> >> Debian maintainer will often apply a patch without waiting for a
> >> new upstream version containing that patch.)
> > See, that is something I wouldn't like distributions to do with any code
> It is your right to hold that opinion. However, no license that tries
> to enforce it will be considered free by Debian. This is not
> negotiable. End of story.
I'm not sure if you read the license, but something like this is not in
Xdebug | http://xdebug.org | firstname.lastname@example.org