[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Academic Free License 2.1 -- free or not?



On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:33:49 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:39:56PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > Still haven't subscribed, but I'm reading the archives
> > > periodically.
> > 
> > It's mandatory, you know. It's just easier to manage...
> 
> Huh?  Subscribing to debian-legal isn't mandatory.

I wish I could answer "Just joking!", but in fact I left out a "not"... 
:p
Actually my sentence should have read:

Errata Corrige>  It's not mandatory, you know.
                      ^^^

I really really apologize for the inconveniences that I may have caused
with this mistake.  :-(

While rereading my message, I realized that I left out another "not":

| I'm sure I follow you correctly here: are you saying that many FIGlet
| copyright holders are willing to let FIGlet be free software?
| This would be great news...

s/I'm sure/I'm not sure/


Memo for myself: remember to sleep more, Francesco...  :-(

-- 
          Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpQR8VzUWh1g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: