[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SPIN Public license

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, eddyp wrote:
> I am planning to package an application covered by the Spin Public License.
> is a free or non-free license?

This license is not DFSG Free, and is most likely not suitable for
inclusion in non-free either.

It was most recently discussed here:


Andrew Suffield lambasted the license authors here:


and I followed suit here with explanations of which clauses fail the


Don Armstrong

Fate and Temperament are two words for one and the same concept.
 -- Novalis [Hermann Hesse _Demian_]

http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: