Re: MTL license
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 03:22:46PM -0700, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
> I wouldn't call it an exaggeration in the sense that they are binding
> anyone in the world who licenses their code to a law and
> jurisprudence in one state in the US. Anyway, it's clear that it is
> not-free... we could debate the degree of non-freeness of each part ad
> infinitum.
Choice of law is considered DFSG-free, which binds the license to the
law of one place. That isn't the problem with choice of venue.
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: