Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG : QPL 3b argumentation.

[Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>]

Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:

>> > Also, consider the annotation :
>> >
>> >   This doesn't really need to be stated, since to do so would be fraudulent.
>> >
>> > Do we really need to continue arguing about this close ? 
>> 
>> Yes -- the annotation is incorrect.  This is much more restrictive
>> than the law requires.  There are many honest activities which break
>> this clause.
>
> Ok, propose an alternate concise writing of this, please ? 

"You must include appropriate and accurate copyright notices on each
source file, and in a reasonable and appropriate place in any binary
file."

-Brian

-- 
Brian Sniffen                                       bts@alum.mit.edu