Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> You could look at it that way. On the other hand, if I release my
> GPLed code under 3(b) then anyone who receives it can pass on the offer
> I gave them (under 3(c)). I am then obliged to pass on my modifications
> directly to people who I never provided binaries to. Is distribution
> under 3(b) and 3(c) non-free?
If those were the only options, it was the loose consensus that that would
not be free.
--
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Reply to: