[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:37:51PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > > The GPL doesn't care what kinds of changes you make (with
> > > very limited exceptions, such as the license blurb).

@ 11/05/2004 20:32 : wrote Raul Miller :
> >  Only if the resulting work (including the implementation of the
> >  support for those keywords) is distributable under the terms of the
> >  GPL.

On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 11:42:45AM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
> Now it's me... I can't find *this* in the GPL at all. What I can find 
> is, if you modify, you should 2 /caput/, 2(a), 2(b), AND 2(c)...

Section 2 allows you to make copies under the terms of section 1, which
requires an appropriate license.  The GPL has some specific requirements
on licenses.  The work as a whole would included GPL licensed software.

And, just about everything you do with a computer involves making copies.

[Yes, I'm aware that some copyright laws make special provisions for
some of these copies -- but that's not a license issue.]


Reply to: