Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL

[Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>]

On May 10, 2004, at 17:44, Raul Miller wrote:

> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:38:23PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > But if you are forced to include certain text in modified documents, 
> > and
> > that text violates a trademark unless the document is unmodified, then
> > the work is DFSG-non-free.
>
> And we have the same problem with "patches-only" licenses.

How so?