[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL



On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:38:23PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> But if you are forced to include certain text in modified documents, and
> that text violates a trademark unless the document is unmodified, then
> the work is DFSG-non-free.

And we have the same problem with "patches-only" licenses.

-- 
Raul



Reply to: