Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 12:08:56PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> The GFDL could requires us not to fix factual inaccuracies.
[A] These would have to be factual inaccuracies in a secondary section
(which rather limits the scope of any such inaccuracy).
[B] Nothing in the GFDL prohibits us from adding additional context or
content to make the facts (or differing points of view) clear.
[C] If the inaccuracies are, in fact, fraud, then the license terms
can't legally require that they be repeated.
Maybe there are serious problems with the GFDL, but this doesn't look
like one of them.