Re: Squeak in Debian?
"Lex Spoon" <email@example.com> wrote:
> I've posted a summary of the discussion on including Squeak in non-free:
> I'll edit it as issues come up. There are two open issues:
The indemnification clause is _not_ acceptable. Using phrases like
"it is extremely unlikely" won't cut it.
> 1. Export regs. Are our servers up to snuff for avoiding export to US
> embargoed countries? (It looks to me that we need to handle this
> anyway, even aside from Squeak's license.)
As I understand it, the US servers do not export software to those
countries. However, probably not all of the non-us mirrors check
whether a request originates from Cuba . In that case, the mirrors
would be violating the license (but no law that applies to them).
This is different from what I said before, because I didn't think
about mirrors outside the US redistributing software to Cuba.
 The mail that was sent to the mirrors for the crypto-in-main
transition is at
Checking for country of origin was a suggestion, not a requirement.