Re: Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re : GPL+ for docs
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
.. stuff ...
- The person who makes any modifications must be identified, which
violates the dissident test.
Hmm, a question about this: Wouldn't make this the GPL DFSG-nonfree? It
"You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating
that you changed the files and the date of any change."
Or does this not imply that I have to give my name, too? Have I only to
state the fact _that_ I changed the files?
I think this does *not* imply you have to give your name. P.ex.:
* CHANGED by someone at 23.Oct.2032: the function fx() now frobnicates
* much more than before
br, hth, Massa