Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested
From: Humberto Massa <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:46:36 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 404F466C.50301@almg.gov.br>
In-reply-to: <OLceq.A.lxG.3A0TAB@murphy>
References: <OLceq.A.lxG.3A0TAB@murphy>

Jeremy Hankins wrote:

4) Each reason should refer explicitly to the freedom that is
   restricted, and how it is restricted.  Including the DFSG section
   number is not necessary.

I know you gave some time to discuss it, and I did not oppose, but,looking at the edited summary below this, I prefer the inclusion of theDFSG section number.


thanks,
Massa

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested
  - From: Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>

Prev by Date: Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested
Next by Date: Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested
Previous by thread: Re: Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re : GPL+ for docs
Next by thread: Re: DRAFT summary of the OPL; feedback requested
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread