On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:07:18AM -0500, Simon Law wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:08:29PM -0500, Jeremy Hankins wrote: > > Here's a summary, since it doesn't seem like anyone has anything more to > > say on the subject: > > Hmm... I hate to seem authoritarian, but I'd like to see a > little more formality in d-l summaries. > > What would be nice is a draft to go out a couple of days before > the actual summary is published. This allows people who are busy to get > their last words in. I agree. > As well, it would be nice to quote the entire license and our > exact concerns in the summary. This way, people looking through our > archives in the future won't have to do more research tracking down lost > texts. I agree. Furthermore, when we can ground an objection on the DFSG, we should do so. -- G. Branden Robinson | If atheism is a religion, then Debian GNU/Linux | health is a disease. branden@debian.org | -- Clark Adams http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature