Re: crypto in non-free (again)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: crypto in non-free (again)
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:57:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040228095740.GA13423@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040228091803.A96628@nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20040228091803.A96628@nessie.mcc.ac.uk>

* Ian Beckwith (ianb@nessie.mcc.ac.uk) [040228 10:25]:
> If I understand things correctly, their licenses would permit the move
> (ie meet the EAR requirements) , and in the case of rsaref2 and pgp5i,
> the only thing holding them in non-us is the RSA patent, which I
> believe expired in September 2000.

RSA has expired. But you'll need to make sure that this was the only
issue.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- crypto in non-free (again)
  - From: Ian Beckwith <ianb@nessie.mcc.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: crypto in non-free (again)
Next by Date: Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?
Previous by thread: crypto in non-free (again)
Next by thread: Re: crypto in non-free (again)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread