debian-legal Feb 2004 by thread

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

automated response karen
Re: Revised JasPer License Andrew Suffield

Re: Revised JasPer License Walter Landry
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Revised JasPer License Nathanael Nerode

Re: Revised JasPer License Bernhard R. Link

Re: Revised JasPer License Nathanael Nerode
Re: Revised JasPer License Anthony DeRobertis

Annuaire des subventions au Quebec / The Canadian Subsidy Directory 2004 infoage
Re: crypto in non-free Brian M. Carlson

Re: crypto in non-free Ben Reser

Re: crypto in non-free Brian M. Carlson
Re: crypto in non-free Ian Beckwith

Re: XFree86 license difficulties paul cannon

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Andrew Suffield
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Anthony DeRobertis
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: XFree86 license difficulties paul cannon

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Måns Rullgård

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Don Armstrong
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Matthew Garrett

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Don Armstrong
Re: XFree86 license difficulties MJ Ray

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Måns Rullgård
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Don Armstrong
Re: XFree86 license difficulties MJ Ray
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Måns Rullgård
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Don Armstrong
Re: XFree86 license difficulties MJ Ray
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Anthony DeRobertis

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Brian Thomas Sniffen

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Måns Rullgård
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Glenn Maynard
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Måns Rullgård
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Glenn Maynard

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Anthony DeRobertis

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Ken Arromdee

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Don Armstrong

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Ben Reser
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Don Armstrong
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Glenn Maynard
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Don Armstrong
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Andrew Suffield
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Ken Arromdee
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Henning Makholm
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Ken Arromdee
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Henning Makholm
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Ken Arromdee
Re: XFree86 license difficulties Henning Makholm

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Glenn Maynard

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Anthony DeRobertis

Re: XFree86 license difficulties Glenn Maynard

Re: GPL compatibility question. MJ Ray
Warning: E-mail viruses detected MailScanner
Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support? Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Licences with mutually exclusive terms Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Help with SPIN License Anthony DeRobertis

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Help with SPIN License Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Help with SPIN License Henning Makholm

Re: Help with SPIN License Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Forward: Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files Anthony DeRobertis
Licence query Roger Leigh

Re: Licence query Andrew Suffield
Re: Licence query Don Armstrong

Re: Licence query Roger Leigh

Re: mysql license update Anthony DeRobertis

Re: mysql license update Steve Langasek

Re: mysql license update Anthony DeRobertis

What constitutes a package for Policy Adam Majer

Re: What constitutes a package for Policy Adam Majer
Re: What constitutes a package for Policy Joel Baker

Re: What constitutes a package for Policy Steve Langasek

Re: What constitutes a package for Policy Andreas Barth
Re: What constitutes a package for Policy Joel Baker

partial license audit of XFree86 4.3.0 Branden Robinson

Re: partial license audit of XFree86 4.3.0 Joel Baker

Re: partial license audit of XFree86 4.3.0 Branden Robinson

Re: partial license audit of XFree86 4.3.0 Josh Triplett

Advice on an almost public domain package Magnus Therning

Re: Advice on an almost public domain package Brian Thomas Sniffen

Re: Advice on an almost public domain package Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Advice on an almost public domain package Andrew Suffield

Re: Advice on an almost public domain package Måns Rullgård
Re: Advice on an almost public domain package Glenn Maynard

Re: Advice on an almost public domain package Anthony DeRobertis

Fwd: [Politech] California DeCSS case eventually, finally, over [ip] Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Fwd: [Politech] California DeCSS case eventually, finally, over [ip] Glenn Maynard
Re: Fwd: [Politech] California DeCSS case eventually, finally, over [ip] Ben Reser

Re: Fwd: [Politech] California DeCSS case eventually, finally, over [ip] Andrew Suffield

Re: Fwd: [Politech] California DeCSS case eventually, finally, over [ip] Sam Hocevar
Re: Fwd: [Politech] California DeCSS case eventually, finally, over [ip] Ben Reser
Re: Fwd: [Politech] California DeCSS case eventually, finally, over [ip] Andrew Suffield
Re: Fwd: [Politech] California DeCSS case eventually, finally, over [ip] Ben Reser

Bug#231603: Licence problem in /etc/amavis-ng/amavis.conf Vincent CORREZE
New License Approved and New Software Release Available Michael Adams
Advice for software license Mike Hommey

Re: Advice for software license Don Armstrong

Re: Advice for software license Mike Hommey

Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Branden Robinson

Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Kendall Bennett
Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Mike A. Harris
Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Sven Luther

Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Branden Robinson

Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Sven Luther
Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Branden Robinson
Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Sven Luther

Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Branden Robinson

Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Keith Packard

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Leon Shiman
Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license mcnichol

Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Mike A. Harris
Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license Keith Packard

Re: FWD from XFree86 forum: GPL-incompatible license mcnichol

OpenPBS license revisited Michael Banck

Re: OpenPBS license revisited Michael Banck
Re: OpenPBS license revisited Matthew Palmer

Re: OpenPBS license revisited Henning Makholm

Re: OpenPBS license revisited Matthew Palmer
Re: OpenPBS license revisited Henning Makholm
Re: OpenPBS license revisited Michael Banck
Re: OpenPBS license revisited Henning Makholm
Re: OpenPBS license revisited Anthony DeRobertis

Re: OpenPBS license revisited Anthony DeRobertis

free licensing of TEI Guidelines Syd Bauman

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines MJ Ray

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Henning Makholm

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines MJ Ray
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Henning Makholm
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines MJ Ray
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Henning Makholm
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines MJ Ray
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Henning Makholm
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Andrew Suffield
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Andrew Suffield
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Syd Bauman
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines MJ Ray
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Henning Makholm
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Anthony DeRobertis
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Josh Triplett
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines MJ Ray
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Anthony DeRobertis
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Ken Arromdee
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Henning Makholm
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Anthony DeRobertis
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Branden Robinson

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Anthony DeRobertis

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines MJ Ray

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Andrew Suffield
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Anthony DeRobertis

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Andrew Suffield

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Nathanael Nerode

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Walter Landry

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Branden Robinson
Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Henning Makholm

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Anthony DeRobertis

Re: free licensing of TEI Guidelines Nathanael Nerode

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Matthew Palmer

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Simon Law

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Henning Makholm

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Joe Moore
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Henning Makholm
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Henning Makholm
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Don Armstrong

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Henning Makholm

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Henning Makholm
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Don Armstrong
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Mahesh T. Pai
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Jeremy Hankins
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Henning Makholm
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Jeremy Hankins

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: debian-legal review of licenses Nathanael Nerode

Re: debian-legal review of licenses Henning Makholm

DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted David Nusinow

Re: DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted Don Armstrong

Re: DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted Henning Makholm

Re: DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted Don Armstrong
Re: DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted Henning Makholm

Re: DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted MJ Ray

Re: DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted Branden Robinson

Re: DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted Branden Robinson
Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License (Proposed) Simon Law

Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License (Proposed) Henning Makholm

Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License (Proposed) Simon Law
Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License (Proposed) Anthony DeRobertis

Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License Simon Law

differences between X-Oz and XFree86 1.1 license Branden Robinson
Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License Ben Reser

Patent issues Roland Stigge

Re: Patent issues Andreas Barth
Re: Patent issues Brian M. Carlson

Re: Re: Patent issues Roland Stigge

Re: Patent issues Andreas Barth
Re: Patent issues Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Patent issues Branden Robinson
[OT] "is really" (Was: Re: Patent issues) Marco Franzen
Re: [OT] "is really" (Was: Re: Patent issues) Branden Robinson

MySQL Licensing Issues Zak Greant

Re: MySQL Licensing Issues Andres Salomon

ALERT - Virus W32/Netsky.b@MM found; an attachment/message has be en quarantined DSAVDIMMPDC001(Network Associates Anti-Virus - Mailbox Agent)
Re: XFree86 is changing their license Sven Luther

Re: XFree86 is changing their license David Nusinow
Re: XFree86 is changing their license Ben Reser

Licence Query: petris (new package) Andree Leidenfrost

Re: Licence Query: petris (new package) Henning Makholm
Re: Licence Query: petris (new package) Branden Robinson
Debian Legal summary of the Petris license (Proposed) Simon Law

Re: Debian Legal summary of the Petris license (Proposed) Jens Peter Secher

Re: Debian Legal summary of the Petris license (Proposed) Simon Law
Re: Debian Legal summary of the Petris license (Proposed) Branden Robinson

Debian Legal summary of the Petris license Simon Law

Re: Debian Legal summary of the Petris license Andree Leidenfrost

POSIX manpages Martin Schulze

Re: POSIX manpages Andrew Suffield

Re: POSIX manpages Branden Robinson

Re: POSIX manpages Martin Schulze

the ripmime license Willi Mann V.

Re: the ripmime license Josh Triplett
Re: the ripmime license MJ Ray

Re: the ripmime license Don Armstrong

<Possible follow-ups>
the ripmime license Willi Mann V.

Re: the ripmime license Paul L Daniels

Re: the ripmime license Willi Mann V.
Re: the ripmime license Paul L Daniels

NASA Open Source License Still Up For Discussion Martin Michlmayr
Cypherpunks anti-License Hubert Chan

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License John Galt

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Hubert Chan

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Hubert Chan

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Henning Makholm

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Nic Suzor
Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Henning Makholm
Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Nic Suzor
Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Hubert Chan
Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Nic Suzor
Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Chris Waters
Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Branden Robinson

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Cypherpunks anti-License Anthony DeRobertis

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Cypherpunks anti-License D. Starner

license for Federal Information Processing Standards Hubert Chan

Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards Brian M. Carlson

Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards Giacomo A. Catenazzi

Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards Mahesh T. Pai
Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards Arnoud Engelfriet
Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards Henning Makholm
Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards Mahesh T. Pai

Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards Ben Reser

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards Chloe Hoffman

Cthugha Free ? Martin Albert

Re: Cthugha Free ? Martin Albert
Re: Cthugha Free ? Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Bug#234477: ITP: logsurfer+ -- real-time system log monitor Rob Weir

Re: Bug#234477: ITP: logsurfer+ -- real-time system log monitor sean finney

Re: Bug#234477: ITP: logsurfer+ -- real-time system log monitor Henning Makholm

Re: Bug#234477: ITP: logsurfer+ -- real-time system log monitor Adam Majer

Re: Bug#234477: ITP: logsurfer+ -- real-time system log monitor Rob Weir
Re: Bug#234477: ITP: logsurfer+ -- real-time system log monitor Anthony DeRobertis

ASL2 vs. GPL? Chris Waters

Re: ASL2 vs. GPL? Don Armstrong
Re: ASL2 vs. GPL? MJ Ray

Re: ASL2 vs. GPL? Chris Waters

Re: ASL2 vs. GPL? Mark Wielaard

E' stato respinto un messaggio indirizzato a vittorino.franchin Vittorino Franchin
E' stato respinto un messaggio indirizzato a rovigo Redazione ROVIGO
Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Oleksandr Moskalenko

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Henning Makholm

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Oleksandr Moskalenko

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Jeremy Hankins
Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Andrew Suffield
Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Jeremy Hankins

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Josh Triplett
Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Branden Robinson

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Brian M. Carlson

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Henning Makholm

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible? Nathanael Nerode

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark Nathanael Nerode

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark Miles Bader

crypto in non-free (again) Ian Beckwith

Re: crypto in non-free (again) Andreas Barth
Re: crypto in non-free (again) Lionel Elie Mamane

Re: crypto in non-free (again) Lionel Elie Mamane
Re: crypto in non-free (again) Peter Palfrader

If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Amaya
Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Stephen Ryan

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? John Goerzen

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Andreas Barth
Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Walter Landry

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Don Armstrong

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Stephen Ryan
Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Don Armstrong
Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Josselin Mouette
Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? MJ Ray

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Zenaan Harkness

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG? Andrew Suffield

The last update was on 22:16 GMT Mon May 18. There are 306 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc