[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License

>>>>> "John" == John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:

John> Since it explicitly grants the right to relicense, it's really
John> irrelevant.  If you don't like the license, substitute any or no
John> license.

Yes.  The license also says that programs released under the CPL are in
the public domain.  I'm just curious as to whether or not the rest of
the license text is actually consistent with that statement.

As to relicensing, IHMO, it's probably better to keep the original
license if possible.  Especially if the CPL is already a free license,
then there's no real point in relicensing.

Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

Attachment: pgpWtMxspcNLn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: