[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DFSG audit of X-Oz license wanted

On 2004-02-17 05:22:39 +0000 David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net> wrote:

3. The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if
          any, must include the following acknowledgment:
"This product includes software developed by X-Oz Technologies (http://www.x-oz.com/)." Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software itself, if and wherever such third-party acknowledgments normally appear.

This clause shares the problems of the new XFree86 licence. It specifies the exact invariant wording for the non-copyright-notice credit, is vague about what "end-user documentation" is (does the licence count?) and doesn't specify who picks which alternate clause applies (should state "at your choice" or similar). It may be DFSG-free, but I would really prefer those buglets fixed.

MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/

Reply to: