Re: If not GFDL, then what?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: If not GFDL, then what?
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 04:59:24 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 1066121964.30749.83.camel@bohr.local>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m265ismval.fsf@the-orb.evenmere.org>
References: <[🔎] acfe8b1e5412f5f7b0b8d43c57490070@Bouncing> <[🔎] 87zng4zyop.fsf@woodcarver.mitre.org> <[🔎] 3303.1066088809@mixed> <[🔎] m265ismval.fsf@the-orb.evenmere.org>

On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 22:01, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:

> Let's say Alice's installer uses secret-sharing or error-correcting
> codes to meld the program and the documentation, then produce separate
> works from them.

Like tar czf?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: If not GFDL, then what?
  - From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)

References:
- Re: If not GFDL, then what?
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: If not GFDL, then what?
  - From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)
- Re: If not GFDL, then what?
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>
- Re: If not GFDL, then what?
  - From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)

Prev by Date: Re: If not GFDL, then what?
Next by Date: Re: Swiss Ephemeris Public License
Previous by thread: Re: If not GFDL, then what?
Next by thread: Re: If not GFDL, then what?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread