[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: begging the question

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:37:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> So you are now retracting your original argument, and instead claiming
> that developers chose to ignore this problem *without* investigating
> the details? In future please state your two-line arguments instead of
> using eight-line vague analogies.
> This is a different assertion to your original one. It is also even
> more unlikely, because it assumes Debian developers acted out of
> deliberate ignorance.

Oh, I wouldn't call "acting out of deliberate ignorance" unlikely at all.

Look at how we're (officially) coping with the Sun RPC license problem.

G. Branden Robinson                |      Mob rule isn't any prettier just
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      because you call your mob a
branden@debian.org                 |      government.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: