Re: GFDL
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> We are talking about two different kinds of packaging. When I speak
> of a "packaging requirement" I'm talking about a requirement that
> applies to the form of a program or other work, but not the substance.
> This a different kind of packaging from the making of Debian packages
> containing the programs and other works.
Are mere packaging requirements allowed for free software? What about
a requirement that demanded the inclusion of particular functions,
perhaps one of which that was called "main"?
Reply to: