Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal

To: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Cc: asd@suespammers.org, yeupou@gnu.org, kstephen@interchange.ubc.ca, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, rms@gnu.org
Subject: Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:10:16 -0400
Message-id: <E1A2Im0-0007EK-Sz@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <87llsg7814.fsf@becket.becket.net> (tb@becket.net)
References: <A2A9CD3A-EC74-11D7-B930-00039317863E@suespammers.org> <E1A1Mco-0003EM-Iz@fencepost.gnu.org> <87llsg7814.fsf@becket.becket.net>

    Everything in Debian is software; the "official logo" is not free, and
    therefore is not in Debian.

Fortunately it is not necessary for me to understand this.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

References:
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

Prev by Date: Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Next by Date: Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Previous by thread: Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Next by thread: Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread