[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> writes:

> Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >>The DFSG lists three specific licenses that are meant to satisfy its
> >>criteria.  Nowadays some Debian developers tend to say that these
> >>three licenses are listed as exceptions to the rules of the DFSG, but
> >>I think that is a misinterpretation.  I think they are meant as
> >>examples to help people understand what the DFSG criteria mean.  An
> >>interpretation of the rules which would lead to rejecting any of thee
> >>licenses is the wrong interpretation.
> > I think you are right.  Note that the DFSG is not listed.
> You mean that the GFDL is not listed, of course.


Reply to: