Re: A possible GFDL compromise
Nathanael Nerode <email@example.com> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Richard Stallman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >>The DFSG lists three specific licenses that are meant to satisfy its
> >>criteria. Nowadays some Debian developers tend to say that these
> >>three licenses are listed as exceptions to the rules of the DFSG, but
> >>I think that is a misinterpretation. I think they are meant as
> >>examples to help people understand what the DFSG criteria mean. An
> >>interpretation of the rules which would lead to rejecting any of thee
> >>licenses is the wrong interpretation.
> > I think you are right. Note that the DFSG is not listed.
> You mean that the GFDL is not listed, of course.