Re: A possible GFDL compromise
Richard Stallman <email@example.com> writes:
> The DFSG lists three specific licenses that are meant to satisfy its
> criteria. Nowadays some Debian developers tend to say that these
> three licenses are listed as exceptions to the rules of the DFSG, but
> I think that is a misinterpretation. I think they are meant as
> examples to help people understand what the DFSG criteria mean. An
> interpretation of the rules which would lead to rejecting any of thee
> licenses is the wrong interpretation.
I think you are right. Note that the DFSG is not listed.