Re: A possible GFDL compromise

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> The DFSG lists three specific licenses that are meant to satisfy its
> criteria.  Nowadays some Debian developers tend to say that these
> three licenses are listed as exceptions to the rules of the DFSG, but
> I think that is a misinterpretation.  I think they are meant as
> examples to help people understand what the DFSG criteria mean.  An
> interpretation of the rules which would lead to rejecting any of thee
> licenses is the wrong interpretation.

I think you are right.  Note that the DFSG is not listed.