Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Richard Stallman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell proposed another interpretation, in which certain
> things that are included in the Debian package files are not "part of
> Debian" for this purpose. That way, you don't have to apply the DFSG
> to them.
No, I did not, and you know it. I already corrected you on this
I said that such things cannot be part of Debian, and if they are,
it's a bug. I never said it was okay to include them.
You are to smart to have made such a distortion of my words