Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> a tapoté :
> * Mathieu Roy (email@example.com) [030922 08:02]:
> > I do not see either why RMS's political essays should be free in the
> > DFSG-sense either, even when included in a documentation.
> Because we require them to be free if we include them in Debian?
Hum, you do not follow a rule _just_ to follow the rules, do you?
There was a reason to promote free software, and I'm not sure that the
whole issue was about political essays, but about programs and their
Not a native english speaker: