Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
* MJ Ray (firstname.lastname@example.org) [030921 18:39]:
> On 2003-09-21 14:52:58 +0100 Mathieu Roy <email@example.com> wrote:
> >It publishes free documentation according to GNU, non-free according
> >to Debian.
> >Please pay attention to the fact that different definitions exists of
> >some concepts.
> A free fairtrade chocolate bar to the first person who finds the GNU
> Free Documentation Definition on their site and send me or the list
> the URL.
Here you are:
This site says:
| The criterion for a free manual is pretty much the same as for free
| software: it is a matter of giving all users certain freedoms.
| Redistribution (including commercial redistribution) must be
| permitted, so that the manual can accompany every copy of the program,
| on-line or on paper. Permission for modification is crucial too.
But later on says that unmodificable non-technical sections are ok.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C