[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal

Alexandre Dulaunoy, 2003-09-21 17:40:11 +0200 :

> So if you take the document from the Gutenberg[1] project, is it
> software for you ?  and you have to apply the rule of DFSG for the
> books of Steven Levy or Victor Hugo ?

I would, and I believe the Debian project would, too.

> Would you modify the various books ?

  Yes.  I'd translate them for people not speaking the language.  Or
write simplified versions for children who do not understand
complicated sentences.  Or both at the same time (insert your
favourite anti-USAns joke here).

> A book is not software and this is not the same definition.  The
> freedom objectives are the same but they are small differences.

  And your point is?

> [1] The vast majority of Gutenberg books are in public domain. So
> you are allowed to make a lot of thing with the books.

  That's why these works would pass the DFSG criteria.

  Again: your point is?  I don't see how the example of a public
domain book brings useful and relevant information to the debate of
whether GFDL documents are free enough to be in Debian.

Roland Mas

Ace of clubs?  Let's see that.
European Juggling Convention -- Svendborg, Denmark.  http://ejc2003.dk

Reply to: