Re: A solution ?!?
On Saturday 20 September 2003 11:08, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Mike Hommey <email@example.com> a tapoté :
> > On Saturday 20 September 2003 02:16, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > You seem to be suggesting that this would satisfy the distribution
> > > terms of the GFDL. Are you really suggesting this? If so, we may have
> > > a solution.
> > Unfortunately, the invariant sections are not the only issue for
> > non-freeness of GFDL.
> Please, try to be constructive. The invariant section is the only
> (apparently) philosophical issue. The others issues are clearly
> practical, it's easier to get rid of it.
Invariant section is a philosophical issue with a (proposed and discussable)
practical solution, while others issues you say are practical would need
philosophical solutions... i.e. changing the license itself.
Which one is easier ?