[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A WDL.

On 2003-09-18, Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
> Eben Moglen has told RMS that it's ok for us to do the Unicode trick:
> to alter it into some other form, and then that new form is entirely
> unrestricted by the license.  And then, if we like, convert back to
> the original form too, which remains unrestricted.

Wasn't the FSF going to actually do this?  Has it happened?


Reply to: