Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: A possible GFDL compromise
Branden Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:27:36PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Indeed, that standpoint of bodily integrity is one of the things that
> > makes sex so much fun, that one is freely giving it up, and the other
> > person doesn't have any right to it.
> Boy, you really *are* a monk, if you think of sex as something which
> necessarily implies the violation of someone's "bodily integrity". :)
I think you've read my words wrongly. I'm saying that sex involves
permitting someone to do something to one's body, such that if you
didn't grant permission, it would be a violation of bodily integrity.