On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 07:37:48PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > On Monday, Sep 8, 2003, at 18:07 US/Eastern, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:15:09PM +0200, Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote: > >>>The subject under discussion is a license which prohibits > >>>distribution > >>>on DRM media. > >> > >>Not on media. On technical methods that limit the free access to the > >>documentation. > > > >This restriction *does* prohibit distribution on DRM media. > > No, it doesn't. CDs have a SCMS, which is a form of DRM. Yet, if we > chose not to utilize the DRM features of the CD format, we can > distribute on CDs. > > As long as we do not obstruct reading or copying, we're fine. The fact > that the media, the software, the whatever has the capability to do so > is irrelevant. You are stretching the term "DRM media" in order to construct a straw man. As such, your argument is irrelevant. My original point stands uncontested. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
pgp6ltS1_YUZc.pgp
Description: PGP signature