Re: getting personalities out of the FSF-Debian argument
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:15:35 -0400, Peter S Galbraith <email@example.com> said:
> I think we (Debian) would be nuts of deprive ourselves of Branden's
> experience with licensing issues, and this issue in particular. RMS
> doesn't read -legal and I'm quite sure other FSF readers won't read
> personal attacks into his writings since they won't be directly at
> them. If he doesn't CC RMS we should all be fine.
I tend to agree. If we need to have a sanitized list, by all
means create a moderated list, and only approve mails from some
people -- let all other mail be redirected to debian-legal, much like
debian-devel-announce replies end up in debian-devel.
Today is what happened to yesterday.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C