[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise



On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:44:00PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, Sep 7, 2003, at 17:24 US/Eastern, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> 
> >>
> >>Could  you  point  me to  the  section  of  DFSG  where you  see  that
> >>prohibiting DRM (in order to limit access and copy of the document) is
> >>unambiguous non-free ?
> >
> >That would be #1.
> 
> "The LICENSE of a Debian component may not..."
> 
> How is that unambiguously non-free under DFSG 1? DFSG clearly speaks 
> only of the license.

The subject under discussion is a license which prohibits distribution
on DRM media.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgplXvqzqRtZy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: