On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 12:09:43PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > our users and the DFSG are equally important), and the code is (at > > > least) not GPL-incompatible (you should read the first paragraph after > > > section 2c of the GPL if you disagree). > > > > You've tried to make that argument before; go dig in the archives for > > the reasons why it's wrong. > > Actually, I haven't done such a thing. Oh, that was Steve Langasek. Anyway, the answer is in that same paragraph; it only applies "unless that component itself accompanies the executable" - clearly irrelevant to us. Plus section 2 isn't the issue anyway, it's section 6 that makes it incompatible. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
pgpwzWfp5pITP.pgp
Description: PGP signature