On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:15:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> You ground your argument on "second hand reports of clarifications" in
> the first quoted paragraph, but then expect debian-legal to furnish
> first-hand clarifications?
Yes. If you're too lazy to be bothered doing that, don't expect anyone
else -- either the release manager nor the glibc maintainers -- to care
about your ravings.
> The burden of proof is on those
> who claim it's been "clarified" to come up with evidence of such.
No, the burden of proof is on those who advocate a change, and it's not
been met.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Is this some kind of psych test?
Am I getting paid for this?''
Attachment:
pgpu8NVB_CpBV.pgp
Description: PGP signature