On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 08:16:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > No, prohibiting DRM systems is unambiguously non-free under the DFSG. > > It just happens to be _silly_ right now. Er. How's that again? How is this significantly different than section 6 of the GPL, which forbids you from putting any further restrictions on anyone who receives a copy (the inherent purpose of DRM systems, presumably, being to limit how far a copy can propagate, the antithesis of Free documentation). Or am I missing something glaringly obvious here? -- Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org> ,''`. Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter : :' : `. `' `-
Attachment:
pgp4SEgKZ42CZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature