Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 07:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030606.071341.74753151.wlandry@ucsd.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1054900949.15853.38.camel@thanatos>
References: <[🔎] 1054900949.15853.38.camel@thanatos>

Thomas Hood <jdthood0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Documents with invariant sections will go in "non-free", but this
> shouldn't prevent Debian and the FSF from continuing to work
> together.

There are more problems with the GFDL than just the invariant
sections.  Invariant sections are just the worst problem.  Since RMS
seems unwilling to change anything, I'd say that _all_ GFDL'd works
have to go into non-free.

Regards,
Walter Landry
wlandry@ucsd.edu

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
  - From: Barak Pearlmutter <barak@cs.may.ie>
- Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@debian.org>

References:
- Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood0@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Next by Date: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Previous by thread: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Next by thread: Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread