[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Removal of non-free



On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:29:16AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> where it's reasonably justified; I think (though I wish it weren't true)
> that some things like old RFCs are unlikely to be republished under a Free
> license anytime soon (and some might never be, since the authors are dead;
> Jon Postel, for example, is the author of many early RFCs).

At least some early RFCs are free. You can see the bug on doc-rfc, which
*still* hasn't been closed, and is *still* in main.

-- 
Brian M. Carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> 0x560553e7
"Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable. Let us prepare
 to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it
 after all." --Douglas Adams

Attachment: pgpV52IiWFhdu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: