[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Suggestion to maintainers of GFDL docs

On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 09:40:49AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Consider this a suggestion to maintainers of packages that contain
> documentation that are under the GFDL, especially if it contains
> invariant sections.  Imagine if an Emacs user visited Info and saw this:
> * Menu:
> * Distrib::	        How to get the latest Emacs distribution.
> * Copying::	        The GNU General Public License gives you permission
> 			  to redistribute GNU Emacs on certain terms;
> 			  it also explains that there is no warranty.
> * GNU Free Documentation License:: The license for this documentation.
> * Why you shouldn't use the GFDL:: Debian doesn't recommend using this license.
> And what if this new section listing reasons _not_ to use this license
> were made...  invariant!
> If the FSF wants to give redistributors a soapbox, perhaps we should use
> it.

	Although incredibly clever, this is not the sort of thing that
we should do.  It would be very hypocritical to use a non-free mechanism
to try to advance free documentation.

	Plus, it would make people angry; and who needs to anger more


Reply to: