[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dissident versus ASP

tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org> writes:

>> Folks who are providing an ASP-style service generally are going to
>> have big web servers and lots of bandwidth anyway; I'm not convinced
>> that distribution of source would be a significant burden for them.
> But the proposals for "closing the loophole" apply not only to the big
> nasty people with the wide pipes, but also to the people, who, say,
> stripped out the source-downloading feature because they are over a
> satellite link to Antartica, and the changes were published anyhow in
> the lab back in Chicago.

Yes.  Which is why I didn't end my message with the bit you quoted,
and went on to talk about such folks.

And for what it's worth, I've never advocated the Affero bit (i.e.,
the quine-like functionality).  I think that the only way the
requisite flexibility can be maintained would be to describe the need
(and permissible mechanisms) to provide source in the license text.

Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333  9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03

Reply to: