Re: Is epic package non-free?
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 15:17, Simon Law wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:53:53PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 13:31, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:15:23AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > > > I was checking the epic package, because i've ITA on it now.After
> > > > the check, i've some doubts about the license:
> > >
> > > http://lwn.net/1998/0611/ircii.html
> > >
> > > Michael Sandrof, Troy Rollo, and Matthew Green are putting the ircII code
> > > under a BSD-like license (without the advertising clause), retroactive
> > > to all versions of ircII, past and present. This action is to remove
> > > any doubt as to whether ircII is Open Source.
> > Thank you aj.
> >
> > Definitely the debian/copyright file needs a update.ASAP i'll do it and
> > upload.
> >
> > Can we consider this issue solved? Are you agree Simon?
>
> Yes, the issue is now settled. epic is DFSG-free.
Did you mean DFSG-compliant? :)
>
> P.S. Please configure your mail reader to respect Mail-Followup-To
> headers. I see that you have Cced me and AJ, even though we ask
> you not to.
Sorry, i did it manually.
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco <stratus@acm.org>
Reply to: