Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> "If you have created a modified version of the Work, and receive
> a request by the Primary Copyright Holder, you must provide
> a copy of your modifications as at the date of the request in
> source form, at cost, to the Primary Copyright Holder."
I think there's a fundamental problem. I'm leaning toward the opinion
that forced distribution is unfree. Forced distribution to users, to
viewers, to authors, or to the public. None of it sits right.
Mark Rafn email@example.com <http://www.dagon.net/>