On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:08:15AM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:45:01PM -0500, Simon Law wrote: > > > Everyone who generates a "cut-and-paste" license out of the GNU > > GPL is plagerising, and violating copyright law. > > No, they're not. Inclusion by reference without changing the document > itself is perfectly possible and allowable. Except that "inclusion by reference" muddies the meaning of "this license" as used in the referenced document. The author of *any* document which refers to itself might be quite surprised to learn what other people claim he means by "this document", if we accept your thesis. Maybe I should write up some heresy, include the Bible by refererence, and then aggravate some Christians by claiming that my heresy is the Word of God by virtue of the Holy Word flowing through my "inclusion by reference." -- G. Branden Robinson | The Rehnquist Court has never Debian GNU/Linux | encountered a criminal statute it branden@debian.org | did not like. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- John Dean
Attachment:
pgpu6eoLfAMXV.pgp
Description: PGP signature