[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes

On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:52:56AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com> writes:
> > No, it doesn't.  The RPSL allows modifications.  It allows derived
> > works.  It allows them to be distributed under the same terms as the
> > license of the original software.  Since it complies with all three of
> > these terms, it complies with the logical and of them, which is #3.
> No no, you miss the point.  The original software can be distributed
> without telling anyone anything except the recipient.
> The modified software can be distributed only if you tell the public
> at large.  That is a different condition.

No no no, Thomas, he "already disposed" of #3.

He's made up his mind; don't try to confuse him with the facts.

G. Branden Robinson                |    Men use thought only to justify
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    their wrong doings, and speech only
branden@debian.org                 |    to conceal their thoughts.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Voltaire

Attachment: pgpFomeHIkTan.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: