Re: Perl module licensing, the next step
Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:
> You can always introduce a GR.
This is fucking ridiculous; I've already explained twice what Ardo
needs to do to get his packages past us and that's simply to comply
with policy. I've already explained twice that the problems with the
equivocal (at best) 'same terms as perl' ``license'' are not keeping
his packages out of the archive. Why the hell is anyone talking about
GRs and/or veto powers? *BLAH*
--
James
Reply to: