Re: GNU FDL 1.2 draft comment summary posted, and RFD
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:56:25PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This "preferred form" rule has always bothered me somewhat for these
> reasons, particularly in the context of existing Debian packages
> containing docs distributed in a format other than the original. And maybe
> it's not reasonable for me to hope that the legalese can be made precise
> enough to address this, but there you have it.
Perhaps you specify that any systems required to edit using the preferred
form must also be (made) available under a "compliant" license (i.e. one
which satisfies the DFSG)...
--
Nick Phillips -- nwp@lemon-computing.com
Don't you wish you had more energy... or less ambition?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: