[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: License of honeyd

Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org> writes:

> I'm ok with 1, 2 and 4. But 3 (and advertisement clause) I'm not
> sure about.  I've searched the list but havent't found any
> information on wether advertisement clauses are ok or not. The
> latest license mentioning an advertisement clause [2] wasn't turned
> down because of this.

We generally accept sw with a noxious advertising clause.  It is,
however, not GPL compatible.

However, people usually have the clause because they copied the
license from the old BSD license.  You should ask the author if he
will follow UCB's lead and remove it.


Reply to: