Re: Documentation licenses (GFDL discussion on debian-legal)
Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I agree that the DFSG should also be applied to non-software. However, I
> also think that Debian's infrastructure shouldn't be burdened with lots
> of data whose principal applications have nothing to do with software.
Perhaps, but the current rules for Debian are essentially that any
RC-bug-free, DFSG-compliant package which some developer is willing to
maintain, can be part of Debian.